Caveat lector (written as I orient myself to the audience for the next book I want to write)
October 2, 2014 Leave a comment
The conceptual themes advanced in this book emerged from puzzling over the positions and propositions of others that did not, for me, fit together. I hope readers appreciate the coherence of the picture I paint, but, even more, that they become engaged in fresh directions of puzzle posing and probing. After all, to move beyond the gaps I identify in the study of variation and heredity requires a wide range of inquiries from people in many different areas… Nature-Nurture? No, 2014
…the book as a whole becomes an opening-up theme. The book does not provide a theory to explain unruly complexity in any specific field or situation, but opens up issues about addressing complexity in ways that point to further work that needs to be undertaken to deal with particular cases. Unruly Complexity, 2005
A few years ago an experienced facilitator admonished me not to think too much about how to support the translation into everyday work and life of tools and processes [for collaboration and reflective practice] introduced in a workshop setting. The advice was to the effect that tools and processes are taken up only if they are introduced in actual work settings. http://wp.me/p1gwfa-tz 2013
The conceptual themes advanced in this book emerged from puzzling over positions and propositions until they fitted together for me. I hope readers appreciate the coherence of the picture I paint, but, even more, that they become engaged in fresh directions of puzzle posing and probing. However, I am well aware of the limitations of building from the conceptual side and writing not to a specific audience.
My themes may well open up or point to the complexity to be addressed by others in particular cases that concern them. Yet the uptake of themes—just as for the collaborative and reflective tools and processes—still depends on the extent to which a person is able to weave them into their heterogeneous construction of knowledge and action from diverse resources and practical considerations that are given by their particular situations and life histories. This limitation can be seen as an invitation to readers to translate the themes into the terms of their own fields of inquiry and action, and to explore what difference they make. The invitation may be passed by, especially when I do not demonstrate the payoff and cannot support readers in such efforts. So I certainly understand if important concrete—local or global—projects of caring, collaboration and change in response to challenges and crises take precedence over the conceptual explorations I want to encourage. With this caveat lector, I will continue.